Descent: 10 feet (3 m)
Description:
The east side of Quinnhill is short, straight, and to the point. It
stays in the 18-19% range for nearly a tenth of a mile.
Altimeter altitude
(Altitude linearly interpolated from altimeter
samples, and smoothed with a 0.04mi gaussian.)
![](quinnhill_aalt.gif)
Each horizontal line is 100 feet. Each vertical
line is 0.2 miles. Gradiometer grade
(Grade linearly interpolated from gradiometer
samples, and smoothed with a 0.04mi gaussian.)
![](quinnhill_ggrade.gif)
Each horizontal line is 2% grade. Each vertical
line is 0.2 miles. Altimeter grade
(Grade linearly interpolated from altimeter
samples, and smoothed with a 0.20mi gaussian.)
![](quinnhill_agrade.gif)
Each horizontal line is 2% grade. Each vertical
line is 0.2 miles. Comparison of grades
(Green grade is from the gradiometer, magenta grade
is from the altimeter, and white is where they
overlap.)
![](quinnhill_cgrade.gif)
Each horizontal line is 2% grade. Each vertical
line is 0.2 miles.
Overall (averaging my first 20 hills),
the gradiometer grade averages 0.63 (% grade)
higher than the altimeter grade, with a standard
deviation of 4.5 (% grade per road).
This error may be due to:
-
Uneven sampling -- I take more samples when the
hill gets steep.
-
Calibration error (of the gradiometer or
altimeter).
In the end, though, I think that each individual
sample is accurate to within about 2% for that
instantaneous segment of road. My results may
not always agree with my altimeter, but they are
generally repeatable within 1%. I think that
I just need to take more samples to generate
more accurate graphs.
Raw Data:
Dist Grade Alti. Location
---- ----- ------ --------
0.00 -7% 280 start - University Ave
0.05 7% 270 climbing looms ahead
0.11 19% 310 317 Quinnhill - serious, steady climbing
0.16 18% 350 311 Quinnhill - same
0.17 19% 370 309 Quinnhill - same
0.18 18% 380 305 Quinnhill - almost at top
0.20 0% 400 top of hill - La Cuesta
Back to
Lucas's
cycling gradiometer page.